The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has developed an edutainment web application that allows you to be in control of the United States energy. The goal of the game is to rework the U.S. energy portfolio to double the energy production in the United while decreasing the total carbon emissions.

Try the Energy Cocktail to see if you can produce enough energy to power America while balancing carbon emissions and costs.

Based on my trial and error — to keep costs in check, and provide adequate production, nuclear and biomass energy are integral to the solution. Let me know what you discover.

Incoming search terms:

• www greenandcleannation com (3)
• the energy cocktail (1)
• heating oil subsidy dec 2011 north east (1)
• green cocktail energy (1)
• green and clean nation (1)
• ENGERYCOCKTAIL (1)
• energy cocktail powering a nation (1)
• energy cocktail game (1)
• energy cocktail (1)
• cocktail energy (1)

This factoid comes from the Fall 2010 issue of Northeast Sun from the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association.

As a region, the Northeast is highly reliant on heating oil. The region consumes 80.3% of all the heating oil in the US. In fact, each year the Northeast consumes about 5.5 billion gallons per year of heating oil. At a price of $2.75
per gallon, this equals about $15 billion per year that is spent on heating oil, of which 78% of this money leaves the region.

Ouch. For those of you that are newer to the bio-thermal industry, this begins to explain the interest from many northeast homeowners and businesses in moving toward renewable energy alternatives.

Incoming search terms:

• heating oil consumption (6)
• US Northeast heating oil deamdn (2)
• energy alternatives to oil in the Northeast (2)
• residential heating oil consumption in the northeast (1)
• Norhteast Home heating oil consumption per year (1)
• northeast heating oil consumption (1)
• northeast heating oil demand (1)
• oil consumption northeast (1)
• oil heat consumptiomn (1)
• oil heating usage for december (1)

If you wonder what the future might hold for renewable energy markets, one needs look no further than Sweden. Surprising to those in the US, biomass has now surpassed oil to become the number one source for energy in Sweden. The Swedish government has set the bar even higher — according to the Wood Resource Quarterly, Sweden is targeting 50% of all energy coming from renewable energy by 2020.

Contrast Sweden’s 32% biomass utilization with the United States where only 3.8% (Lawrence Livermore Lab) of our energy comes from our biomass resources. This paints a pretty dismal picture of the US policy on biomass-based energy utilization, especially when one looks at the plentiful resources the country offers.

A map of US private and public forest land

Incoming search terms:

• us forest map (38)
• united states forest map (26)
• us forests map (22)
• map of us forests (20)
• map of forests in the united states (18)
• us forests (17)
• Forests in the United States (16)
• usa forest map (14)
• us forest maps (14)
• forest map of the united states (12)

If you have ever wondered about the current state of research and development of technologies for utilizing wood for the production of energy, your wait is over.

A new report from the University of Tennessee Office of Bioenergy Programs and the U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities reviews the current state of R&D of technologies which utilize wood for the production of energy. It is a rather substantial and worthwhile read if you are curious about what the coming years may bring to woody biomass based industry. The report characterizes industry process designs, stage of development or commercialization, and suitability for the marketplace.

Go here to download a copy of  “Wood to Energy: A State of the Science and Technology” (PDF)

Incoming search terms:

• the future of biomass energy (2)
• us endowment for forestry and communities (2)

We are setting up a show-down among three recently hot topics – energy, economy and environment.

Looking back over the past year is quite interesting. We have had oil (and its derived products) reach historic price levels. We have seen unprecedented awareness in schools and on main street regarding greenhouse gases and environmental issues. Finally, we have the economic events of the past few months that have cast a dark shadow of uncertainty over it all.

The average person can wrap their arms around one issue or decide between two competing objectives, but it gets more complicated when you need to choose among three competing interests.

People are increasingly looking at their pocketbook and asking themselves – “I like the idea of being environmentally friendly, but how much is it worth to me?” Of course, this is being driven by increasing economic uncertainty. Good environmental ideas from last month are still good ideas, but I would submit that we begin to see a shift toward more practical ideas from consumer attitudes and behaviors.

This eco-pragmatism (evaluation of an action or purchase based on the practicality of the good or service as part of its environmental impact) can be contrasted with greenwashing  (application of an eco-friendly label or classification to a product (often inappropriately) so that it appears to be eco-friendly) that you have undoubtedly been subjected to as you walk down the aisle at your favorite store.

In the coming year, I think we will see a more products that offer a positive economic impact while improving an environmental concern. Costly items like solar panels and wind turbines will still have their buyers, but clean-tech pellet and wood boilers will share the spotlight. While the latter does not provide the air quality improvement of the first two, it is a significant improvement over a conventional fossil fuel.

Recently there has been increased press coverage regarding the steps some state and provincial governments are taking to ensure that people can afford to stay warm this winter. Take a look at what is happening in Canada in this article from The Canadian Press. If you want a dose of reality — take a look at this article from the The Associated Press. Talk about depressing.

I am not against short-term subsidies, but the money being discussed begs the question — “Isn’t there a better way?” The same families that require the help this winter will most likely require the same help next year when fuel oil prices are even higher. Have we really made in any progress? We may have bought ourselves a little time, but that is all.

Of course the time we buy this winter will not save us for next winter — all of the wonderful energy projects being discussed on the national scene — wind farms, new oil production, solar power are years from widespread realization. So what is the answer?

Basically, there are two things that can be done aside from turning down your thermostat:

Improve home energy efficiency — sixty percent of the nergy used in the home is in the heating system. Insulation, weather stripping, and programable thermostats are just a few of the ways to reduce the fuel requirement in the home. In those regions of the country that are facing a crisis, why not make these improvements a requirement of, or even better yet, part of any fuel subsidy.

Move to a cheaper fuel source — In hard hit rural and small towns, wood or pellet fired systems are a viable option. Now, take that $750 subsidy and apply that to buy-down the interest rate on a loan or even better yet, provide a government guaranteed low interest loan. Imagine what that would do for to make a new wood/pellet heating system affordable AND provide a long-term solution to the heating dilemma. This type of program has been available in Europe for quite some time, so why are we so slow in exploring them?