Archive for July, 2010

Department of Energy: Green heat is often most cost-effective option

US Federal agencies purchased or produced 2.3 TWh of electricity from renewable sources in FY09, representing 4.2% of the Government’s electricity and surpassing the goal of 3% set by EPAct 2005. This represents a 2x increase over 2003. The goal increases this year to 5% of total electricity from renewable sources, and increases again in 2013 to 7.5%.

Perhaps what is most fascinating is that this figure does not include non-electric renewable energy purchased or consumed by the Federal government — sources like bio-thermal space heating or solar thermal hot water. However, according to a Kathleen Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) testimony, “The renewable sources of non-electric energy are often the most cost-effective means to displace fossil energy,” she explains.

With that acknowledgment, what steps can be taken to insure the adoption of these cost effective sources?

One way is increase subsidies to promote adoption, much like those in H.R. 5805: Thermal Renewable Energy and Efficiency Act of 2010. Unfortunately these are only focused on large scale applications. An alternative would be to look to other countries where these alternative technologies have been employed and implement their approach — incentives targeted at residential heating.

The State of New Hampshire’s Wood Pellet Boiler Rebate program is an example of such a program. It is narrowly focused on wood pellets, but removes much of the upfront cost of implementing a system that makes a homeowner energy self-sufficient.

Incoming search terms:

  • greenheat cost (1)
Share

A Bold Vision for 2025: Heating the Northeast with Renewable Biomass

A new study released by the Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) and four other organizations outlines a bold plan that calls for a significant increase in the use of renewable resources for space heating to 25% by the year 2025.  In the plan, biomass gains the largest ground from 4% to over 18% followed by an increase in solar thermal (hot water) to 5% in the same period.

At first pass this is indeed bold with many competing interests – industry, regulation, environmental. However, it also has some merit worth considering. First, the Northeast has plentiful wood and biomass resources (see figure on forest land) and has a culture in many regions of wood-burning. Second, the use of wood for space heat (when done properly) is the “highest and best use” of this natural resource. If you do the math, you quickly realize that solar is not an economical option which is contrasted by wood heat which converts 80%+ of the stored energy in the wood to usable energy (heat).

Next, with the Northeast adopting stricter regulations on wood burning appliances, the new units that are installed reduce wood smoke emissions by 90% or more. One need look no further than Northern Europe where wood heat accounts for up to 30% of energy used with countries targeting even higher consumption to reduce their dependence on foreign energy sources.

Certainly there are limitations to the study, but to make progress one must begin with a plan, even a bold one.

You can find a summary of the report here and a copy of the full report here.

Incoming search terms:

  • heating the northeast (2)
  • bold vision 2025 (1)
  • heating northeast (1)
  • heating the northeast with biomass a bold vision (1)
  • heating the northeast with renewable biomass: a bold vision for 2025 (1)
Share